The AI texture argument, explained

Three columns, not one verdict

GamesRadar’s 11 November story groups “suspected AI textures” with the Epic-account backlash and weak PC options. That is a newsroom repeating player suspicion. It is not Aspyr saying the textures were generated.

PCGamingWiki’s page, edited 13 November 2026, marks AI usage unknown. I found no press-release sentence that confirms or denies generated textures. Until that sentence exists, this page stays in three columns.

Who said what about AI textures. Checked 13 Nov 2026.
ColumnWhat it saysStatus
PlayersSteam reviews and forum posts suspect generated textures.Reported by GamesRadar
PressGamesRadar used “suspected AI textures” in the headline cluster.1 news story
AspyrNo confirmation or denial in the 10 Nov press release.Absent
PCGamingWikiAI usage listed as unknown.1 wiki

What is actually confirmed about the picture

The press release does confirm enhanced textures, UI, and cutscenes, plus 4K on PC, PS5, Xbox Series X|S, and Switch 2 TV mode. “Enhanced” is not the same claim as “generated.” The review context is on review roundup.

Steam store screenshot of DreamWorks Shrek 2 Remastered, swamp path
Steam store screenshot of a character scene in Shrek 2 Remastered

Questions

Did Aspyr admit to AI textures?

No statement I have says that. The suspicion comes from players, repeated by GamesRadar.

Did Aspyr deny it?

I also have no denial. PCGamingWiki leaves the field unknown. That is the whole status.

Sources