The AI texture argument, explained
Three columns, not one verdict
GamesRadar’s 11 November story groups “suspected AI textures” with the Epic-account backlash and weak PC options. That is a newsroom repeating player suspicion. It is not Aspyr saying the textures were generated.
PCGamingWiki’s page, edited 13 November 2026, marks AI usage unknown. I found no press-release sentence that confirms or denies generated textures. Until that sentence exists, this page stays in three columns.
| Column | What it says | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Players | Steam reviews and forum posts suspect generated textures. | Reported by GamesRadar |
| Press | GamesRadar used “suspected AI textures” in the headline cluster. | 1 news story |
| Aspyr | No confirmation or denial in the 10 Nov press release. | Absent |
| PCGamingWiki | AI usage listed as unknown. | 1 wiki |
What is actually confirmed about the picture
The press release does confirm enhanced textures, UI, and cutscenes, plus 4K on PC, PS5, Xbox Series X|S, and Switch 2 TV mode. “Enhanced” is not the same claim as “generated.” The review context is on review roundup.
Questions
Did Aspyr admit to AI textures?
No statement I have says that. The suspicion comes from players, repeated by GamesRadar.
Did Aspyr deny it?
I also have no denial. PCGamingWiki leaves the field unknown. That is the whole status.
Sources
- GamesRadar, 11 Nov 2026 — checked 2026-11-13
- PCGamingWiki — checked 2026-11-13
- Games Press, 10 Nov 2026 — checked 2026-11-13
- TheGamer, 11 Nov 2026 — checked 2026-11-13